<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom &#8211; Killing a golden goose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>Renny - thanks for the comment, and for posting that link. Your point about about more exciting content is well-made, but at the same time, I think Viacom are coming across as being very short-sighted (in the now familiar &quot;old-media&quot; sense of the term).

It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t support their right to protect their content, but if were Viacom, I&#039;d be looking at how I could exploit the interest in the content that appears on YouTube, rather than kill it off.

Cheers

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renny &#8211; thanks for the comment, and for posting that link. Your point about about more exciting content is well-made, but at the same time, I think Viacom are coming across as being very short-sighted (in the now familiar &#8220;old-media&#8221; sense of the term).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t support their right to protect their content, but if were Viacom, I&#8217;d be looking at how I could exploit the interest in the content that appears on YouTube, rather than kill it off.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renny</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/comment-page-1/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>Renny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2007/03/20/viacom-killing-a-golden-goose/#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>Andrew

What about when whole episodes are posted, so there is nothing else to sell beyond the YouTube video? Because that definitely happens. 

I think Viacom is walking a fine line, but I support them on this.  I think online video is ready to really explode, bigger than YouTube.  I&#039;m talking full-on,&lt;a href=&quot;http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2007/01/over_the_top_fi.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;so-called cable-bypass delivery of content&lt;/a&gt;.  But for this to happen, content creators need to know their material won&#039;t be massively pirated. 

I have a feeling if YouTube is cleaned up, we&#039;ll see a bunch of other YouTubes, more exciting and with more content. 

And, legal. 

- Renny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew</p>
<p>What about when whole episodes are posted, so there is nothing else to sell beyond the YouTube video? Because that definitely happens. </p>
<p>I think Viacom is walking a fine line, but I support them on this.  I think online video is ready to really explode, bigger than YouTube.  I&#8217;m talking full-on,<a href="http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2007/01/over_the_top_fi.html" rel="nofollow">so-called cable-bypass delivery of content</a>.  But for this to happen, content creators need to know their material won&#8217;t be massively pirated. </p>
<p>I have a feeling if YouTube is cleaned up, we&#8217;ll see a bunch of other YouTubes, more exciting and with more content. </p>
<p>And, legal. </p>
<p>- Renny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

