<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andrewterry.com &#187; microblogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewterry.com/category/blogging/microblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewterry.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter needs an &#8220;Edit&#8221; function</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2009/06/27/twitter-needs-an-edit-function/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2009/06/27/twitter-needs-an-edit-function/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndrewTerry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Twitter; honestly, I do; but the lack of an Edit function is really starting to piss me off. Like most of the internet on Thursday night (UK time), I was following the news of Michael Jackson&#8217;s shocking and untimely death. One of the first substantive articles I came across was on the LA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Twitter; honestly, I do; but the lack of an Edit function is really starting to piss me off.</p>
<p>Like <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/25/the-web-collapses-under-the-weight-of-michael-jacksons-death/">most of the internet</a> on Thursday night (UK time), I was following the news of Michael Jackson&#8217;s shocking and untimely death. One of the first substantive articles I came across was on the LA Times blog, reporting that the star had been taken to hospital after suffering a cardiac arrest.</p>
<p>I shortened the URL using <a title="bit.ly - a URL shortener" href="http://bit.ly/">bit.ly</a>, and Twittered the following:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/AndrewTerry/status/2332313405"><img class="aligncenter" title="Misspelled Tweet" src="http://img.skitch.com/20090627-rdg7nh8act3n8daus7wcjaxjxk.jpg" alt="" width="523" height="228" /></a></p>
<p>Even as my finger was hitting the Return key, my subconscious spell-checker was shouting a warning, but too late.</p>
<p>It seems that <a href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/25/internet-lets-bad-spellers-grieve-for-micheal-jackson/">I wasn&#8217;t alone</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the trending topics list on Twitter is a rotating set of call-outs to the late King of Pop. At first it was shocking to see how many people are capable of operating Twitter, but not spelling “Michael” correctly.</p></blockquote>
<p>Over on <a title="AndrewTerry on Friendfeed" href="http://friendfeed.com/andrewterry">my Friendfeed</a>, however, it was a different matter. My Tweets get cross-posted there, but Friendfeed allows me to edit anything I post into my stream:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://friendfeed.com/andrewterry/afc76a45/la-times-reporting-michael-jackson-has-had"><img class="aligncenter" title="Misspelled Tweet, corrected on Friendfeed" src="http://img.skitch.com/20090627-ff3p79a58u2x1nwcdp83q3fkbm.jpg" alt="" width="543" height="83" /></a></p>
<p>See the difference? Here we have the &#8220;same&#8221; post from Twitter, but edited to correct my stupid spelling mistake.</p>
<p>Like  Friendfeed, Twitter is, at heart, an online publishing tool, so the ability to edit a post <em>after</em> publication is basic functionality, and something that Twitter has been lacking for too long now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2009/06/27/twitter-needs-an-edit-function/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

