<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andrewterry.com &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewterry.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewterry.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Got an MP3 player? You&#8217;re under arrest.</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2008/02/13/got-an-mp3-player-youre-under-arrest/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2008/02/13/got-an-mp3-player-youre-under-arrest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AndrewTerry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2008/02/13/got-an-mp3-player-youre-under-arrest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Daily Mail carried this story about a hapless &#8211; and innocent &#8211; chap who was arrested by gunpoint after a member of the public mistook the MP3 player in his pocket for a gun. The story unfolds like an episode of 24, with this poor chap being followed on CCTV cameras, which seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Daily Mail carried <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=513875&amp;in_page_id=1770">this story</a> about a hapless &#8211; and innocent &#8211; chap who was arrested by gunpoint after a member of the public mistook the MP3 player in his pocket for a gun.</p>
<p>The story unfolds like an episode of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0285331/">24</a>, with this poor chap being followed on CCTV cameras, which seem to <a href="http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2024932.0.4_2m_cameras_watch_us_so_is_Big_Brother_already_here.php">litter the streets of Britain</a> in greater numbers than cigarette butts, before armed police swooped and carted him to have his fingerprints mugshot and DNA sample taken.</p>
<p>The frightening thing about this story isn&#8217;t that the guy was arrested at gunpoint &#8211; a member of the public called it in, and the police have a duty to act, and where weapons are suspected, of course, they require an armed response. No, the frightening thing is this quote from the Staffordshire Police (my emphasis):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the man was released and taken home, as <strong><em>no further action was required</em></strong>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Wrong. </p>
<p>Wrong, wrong, wrong. <em>I&#8217;ll</em> tell you what action is required: By the police&#8217;s own admission, the guy is innocent. That means his fingerprints, mugshot and DNA information has no place in a criminal database, and it should be removed.</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:7c17b249-8e20-4b1f-94c1-11d1353eacbf" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/civil" rel="tag">civil</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/liberty" rel="tag">liberty</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/liberties" rel="tag">liberties</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/rights" rel="tag">rights</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/freedom" rel="tag">freedom</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/police%20state" rel="tag">police state</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2008/02/13/got-an-mp3-player-youre-under-arrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired for losing a laptop.</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2006/12/17/fired-for-losing-a-laptop/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2006/12/17/fired-for-losing-a-laptop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2006/12/17/fired-for-losing-a-laptop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A worker from Boeing has been fired, after their laptop was stolen. The laptop was holding data for nearly 400,000 retired Boeing workers, and included home address, home telephone number, social security and salary details (I&#8217;m guessing that person had something to do with the Boeing pension scheme&#8230;.). My first reaction to this story was, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A worker from Boeing has been <a href="http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/business/16252430.htm">fired</a>, after their laptop was stolen. The laptop was holding data for nearly 400,000 retired Boeing workers,  and included home address, home telephone number, social security and salary details (I&#8217;m guessing that person had something to do with the Boeing pension scheme&#8230;.).</p>
<p>My first reaction to this story was, wow!,  that&#8217;s harsh, but then I read on and saw that, against company policy, the data wasn&#8217;t encrypted. And I started to wonder how I&#8217;d feel if I was the CTO, or IT Manager, or whoever is responsible for Boeing&#8217;s personal computing infrastructure. From the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Jim McNerney, Boeing&#8217;s chairman, president and chief executive, said the breach of company policy was so serious that some Boeing managers also will be disciplined.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think Boeing have got it dead right; this doesn&#8217;t just stop with the person taking that laptop off-site. There must be a reason for that user not encrypting their data, and I suspect responsibility for <em>that</em> lies at the feet of the people running Boeing&#8217;s IT as much as it lies at the feet of the user.</p>
<p>Think about it &#8211; why do you <em>not</em> do some things? Usually because they take too long, or they&#8217;re too complicated, or both. Would you forget to set your burglar alarm? No. Would you forget to lock your front-door before leaving the house? No. The reason that you don&#8217;t is because setting the alarm and locking your door are simple, 5-second jobs.</p>
<p>Using IT security should be that simple, too &#8211; a 5-second job that quickly becomes second nature. If you&#8217;re responsible for IT Security in your organisation, put yourself in the shoes of your users and tell me; is <em>your</em> security so easy to use that your users would never take unencrypted data off-site&#8230;.?</p>
<p>[tags]EFS, Boeing, IT Management, CTO, encryption[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2006/12/17/fired-for-losing-a-laptop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Would Want to Bomb Paypal?</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2006/11/01/who-would-want-to-bomb-paypal/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2006/11/01/who-would-want-to-bomb-paypal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2006/11/01/who-would-want-to-bomb-paypal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this article from the CBS news for San Jose, someone bombed the offices of Paypal on the night of Halloween. It would be easy to joke about an Ebay transaction gone way, way wrong, but for the fact that some pretty heavy explosives were used to make the point: &#8220;Whatever caused this (blast) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://cbs5.com/local/local_story_305004735.html">this article</a> from the CBS news for San Jose, someone bombed the offices of Paypal on the night of Halloween.</p>
<p>It would be easy to joke about an Ebay transaction gone way, <em>way</em> wrong, but for the fact that some <em>pretty heavy explosives</em> were used to make the point:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Whatever caused this (blast) was pretty strong,&#8221; added Fire Department Capt. Jose Guerrero. &#8220;It&#8217;s tough to break one of these [... plate glass... ] windows.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Thankfully no-one was hurt in the blast, but I wonder what on earth the motive could be?</p>
<p><em>Update:02/11/2006</em> &#8211; Personally, I&#8217;ve never had a problem, but it seems that Paypal has quite a poor reputation after all. Take a look at some of the links <a href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=7838">posted</a> over dvorak.org</p>
<p>[tags]ebay, paypal, halloween, bombing[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2006/11/01/who-would-want-to-bomb-paypal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another IE7 Vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/26/another-ie7-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/26/another-ie7-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/26/another-ie7-vulnerability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IE7 has only been on release for a week, but Secunia are reporting another vulnerability along with a working proof-of-concept. This one is about spoofing the address bar in a pop-up window, and has the potential to be used in phishing attacks. With IE7 having been available in Beta form for a long time, there will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE7 has only been on release for a week, but Secunia are reporting another <a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/22542/">vulnerability</a> along with a working proof-of-concept. This one is about spoofing the address bar in a pop-up window, and has the potential to be used in phishing attacks.</p>
<p>With IE7 having been available in Beta form for a long time, there will inevitably be a trickle of new vulnerabilities over the coming weeks, while the people who research these things for &#8220;fun and profit&#8221; take advantage of the fact that IE7 is being pushed out via WIndows Update.</p>
<p>As always, while most corporate IT users will have the rollout of IE7 managed for them, it&#8217;s the unsuspecting home user who will be the target of these weaknesses.</p>
<p><strong><em>Update @13:47</em></strong>: The IE Team at Microsoft have now been alerted to this, and posted some guidance, which you can read <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2006/10/26/ie-address-bar-issue.aspx">here</a>. It mentions that the built-in Phishing Filter should warn against this technique, but because the Phishing Filter works against a list of known phishing sites rather than behaviour, I think this will still catch some people out. My advice would be change browsers or trust no-one.</p>
<p>[tags]internet explorer, IE7, vulnerability, weakness, phishing, Secunia, Microsoft[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/26/another-ie7-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
