<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>andrewterry.com &#187; YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewterry.com/category/social-media/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewterry.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GooTube vs Copyright. Round 1.</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/13/gootube-vs-copyright-round-1/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/13/gootube-vs-copyright-round-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/13/gootube-vs-copyright-round-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the games begin. Time Warner are the first in what could be a long line of copyright holders stepping up to see how deep Google&#8217;s pockets are following their acquisition of YouTube. It&#160;was a sure bet that many copyright holders were waiting to see if YouTube would be snapped-up by a richer adoptive parent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the games begin. Time Warner are the first in what could be a long line of copyright holders <a href="http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1921154,00.html">stepping up to see how deep Google&#8217;s pockets are</a> following their acquisition of YouTube.</p>
<p>It&nbsp;was a sure bet that many copyright holders were waiting to see if YouTube would be snapped-up by a richer adoptive parent before &#8220;pursuing their [copyright] complaints&#8221;, and I&#8217;m not surprised at how quickly Time Warner have moved.</p>
<p>Companies like Time Warner, who had little chance in seeing anything other than their material taken off YouTube, must&nbsp;have been thrilled at the prospect of Google taking them over. Don&#8217;t forget that YouTube doesn&#8217;t make any money &#8211; yet &#8211; but Google make an awful lot of it.</p>
<p>The good new is that Time Warner don&#8217;t appear to be going for the &#8220;sue them into oblivion&#8221; approach:</p>
<blockquote><p>He [Dick Parsons, Time Warner CEO] took a more emollient stance than some when he said: &#8220;We&#8217;d like to have our content displayed on these platforms, but on a basis that it respects our rights as the owner of that content.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It sounds like what they&#8217;re looking for is some way of monetising the content they own&nbsp;whenever it appears on YouTube, in much the <a href="http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=286497">same</a> <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/15717768.htm">way</a> that Universal Music and BMG have recently agreed to.</p>
<p>Either way, the copyright holders see a return &#8211; strike a partnership deal, and monetise the content; or, sue for copyright infringement. What the media companies should not lose sight of is that only one of those options will win favour with the fans; those people whose hard-earned cash ultimately keeps these media companies in business.</p>
<p>[tags]Google, YouTube, GooTube, media, copyright, Warner, BMG[/tags]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/13/gootube-vs-copyright-round-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google buys YouTube for $1.65 Billion</title>
		<link>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/09/google-buys-youtube-for-165-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/09/google-buys-youtube-for-165-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/09/google-buys-youtube-for-165-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billion? I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; BILLION. Confirmed just a few minutes ago at Techcrunch, this will be the news lighting up the blogosphere for the next few hours. More than likely the fact that Google bought You Tube won&#8217;t be the big story. The cost of the deal &#8211; $1.65 billion &#8211; will be the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billion? I&#8217;ll say it again&#8230; BILLION.</p>
<p>Confirmed just a few minutes ago at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/09/google-has-acquired-youtube/">Techcrunch</a>, this will be the news lighting up the blogosphere for the next few hours. More than likely the fact that Google bought You Tube won&#8217;t be the big story. The cost of the deal &#8211; $1.65 billion &#8211; will be the talking point.</p>
<p>As someone who doesn&#8217;t have TV I&#8217;m somewhat bemused by the popularity of YouTube, and from where I&#8217;m sitting that popularity is more a reflection on how bad today&#8217;s TV content has become, rather than how good YouTube content actually is. And perhaps that&#8217;s the point. If anything, this should serve as wake-up call to the TV networks &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/"><em>this</em></a> is your real competition; and <a href="http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=topNews&amp;storyID=2006-10-09T203052Z_01_WEN6650_RTRUKOC_0_UK-MEDIA-YOUTUBE-GOOGLE.xml"><em>this</em></a> is how much it&#8217;s being valued at.</p>
<p>YouTube&#8217;s 65 employees must be on cloud nine, and Google shareholders must be pretty pleased too &#8211; at the time of writing, <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=Google">Google&#8217;s share price</a> was up 2% on the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andrewterry.com/2006/10/09/google-buys-youtube-for-165-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

